An Itneg shaman renewing an offering to the spirit shield (1922, Philippines)
|
|
1.1
Ivan Labayne, Beckoning Baguio:
|
Framed
in lazy opposites, Manila would be the 9 p.m. start of the party,
well-dressed and ready to take in all stimuli while Baguio would be past
midnight, inebriated, dulled and possibly reflective, worn down and
possibly more honest.
|
1.2
Walking Beckoning Baguio:
|
But
the collation of essays into eight sections I take as a reflection of
the tempered nature of walking Baguio. Yeah, walking Baguio can still
feel scattered, but it mostly feels arranged. Due to the city's
smallness, familiarity with spaces becomes easy, and with that
familiarity comes indescribable comfort. In other words, walking Baguio
doesn't feel as messy as walking Manila. This comparison is important
because Baguio and Manila were the first guinea pigs of
American-enforced city planning, the goal of which was to paint in the
minds of the newly colonized that everything was okay and beautiful.
With this historical knowledge, one might say the Americans found more
success in Baguio. Beckoning Baguio is a reminder, though, that
the city of pines, as pretty as it is, is mired by the same problems
recognizable throughout the country's many urban landscapes. If this is a
walking book, then it would move the reader to walk and, specifically,
to walk Baguio. When the reader ever reaches that point, I think of no
better companion than these essays.
|
|
2.1
Swedish proverb:
|
No one becomes a good doctor before he fills a churchyard.
|
2.2
Journal, 6 October 2024:
|
Raining outside and natural light is scarcer than usual. My mind hasn't been itself lately, even during days when there was sun.
My sleep hasn't been the best lately. I relied on melatonin more frequently than usual last month.
I continue to struggle with defining what to do in
between work. I think I'm going through an important change within or
I'm going through something that will spur that change.
I am skeptical about whether I am fulfilling (or have
fulfilled) my intention for this year: to FOCUS and BE AUTHENTIC.
I need to be kind to myself.
|
|
3.1
Deene Clark, Writing Alone and With Others:
|
I
open the front door and walk into the house. Already, in the hallway, I
can smell it, and walking down the hallway and into the living room,
the odor is strong: brownies, freshly baked brownies, warm and waiting
for us. Such a delight. Such a welcoming, beckoning house to walk into.
It says, “welcome”—the brownies do. But of course, if brownies, then a
time to eat them, and to chat and laugh and thereby to be at home.
There is other food on the table awaiting the mid-evening
break: melon, raw carrots, freshly washed grapes, coffee, tea, soda,
orange juice and, as I said, chatter and laughter. At the break, we will
have been writing together—the ten or twelve of us—for an hour or so,
having been invited to respond to some lines from a poem or a book, or
to some pictures or to several articles: ancient kitchen utensils, old
fashioned toys and children’s books, a line from a song, the song
itself. That’s how Pat begins the evening.
|
3.2
Writing is embodied:
|
Certain
positions while writing produce certain emotional responses. How we
move our hands, breathe, seated, or how our body is positioned affects
what comes out of our mind.
The embodied experience of writing is important to
consider when writing alone, but it becomes even more important while
writing with others. This is because it is when we decide to write
together and share that writing that past traumas we have about writing
emerge.
So when conducting a workshop, it is important to consider:
- the place (sights, temperature, sound, wideness, etc.)
- the body of the writer
- the rules
- the prompt
|
|
4.1
The question of changing the name of I.A.R.F. [International Association for Religious Freedom] as viewed by Japan Free Religious Association:
|
We
have, therefore, always, been a little dissatisfied with the name of
I.A.R.F. [actually then still called the International Association for Liberal Christianity and Religious Freedom] which has been un-doubtedly Christian-centric. We can, easily
understand that such a Christian-centric attitude is quite natural for
European Christians who think much of their past history and tradition,
because non-Christian liberals in Japan are also much attached to their
own history and tradition.
We are, therefore, very anxious to have the word
“Christianity” dropped from the name of I.A.R.F. If the word
“Christianity” remains un-dropped, we shall be obliged to cancel the
invitation of the 19th Congress in 1967 to Tokyo (as I announced
unofficially in 1961 at Davos Congress) because non-Christian members of
Japan Free Religious Association and religious circles at large in
Japan will not cooperate.
|
4.2
My vision statement:
|
I
have brought to life a creative spirituality—a way of life—customized
to my needs, personality, and strengths. It is a free and inquiring
spirituality that is also anchored to my culture. This creative
spirituality informs how I exist in the world—my daily practices, the
work that I do, and how I act. While it liberates me, it also
strengthens my faith and connection with my kapwa both the
human and the non-human. I'm part of a community of individuals walking
on the same path who support me in the realization of my vision.
|
|
5.1
Shin'ichirō Imaoka:
|
As
you read in my Statement of Faith, there is no mention of God. It is a
creed without a God. I have faith in self, in other people, in society.
There is no God in my creed. However, if one believes that the universe
is religion, then if it is necessary to use the word ‘God’, I see no
objection. Then man is God, society is God and the universe is God.
The founder of Konkokyo, Kawate Bunjiro, pointed out that
the kami is dependent on the adherents and the adherents are dependent
on the kami. It is understandable how the adherents are dependent on the
kami, but it is not clear how the kami is dependent on the adherents
unless one realizes that the founder meant that the kami and the
adherents are inter-dependent. This can be interpreted as meaning that
God depends on the believers, and the believers should be worthy of this
regard.”
|
5.2
Journal, 13 October 2024:
|
Recently,
I've been introduced to the idea that animism, which describes
precolonial Filipino spirituality, could be a resource for my jiyū
shūkyō project, particularly because of its similarities with pantheism.
Shinto is also animist but has pantheist elements. If there is liberal
Shinto then there could be—at least with my personal jiyū shūkyō
project—be a liberal Filipino animism or whatever it is called. In such a
progressive remaking of our precolonial spirituality, what I want to
emphasize is the pantheistic elements—that nature is divine and that
humans are part of that larger nature, intricately connected to it, in
fact.
|
|
6.1
Henry Bugbee, The Inward Morning:
|
Get
it down. Get down so far as possible the minute inflections of day to
day thought. Get down the key ideas as they occur. Don’t worry about
what it will add up to. Don’t worry about whether it will come to
something finished. Don’t give it up when faced with the evidence of
miscarried thought. Write on, not over again. Let it flow. ... Give it a
chance. ... Let one perception move instantly on another. Where they
come from is to be trusted.
|
6.2
Journal, 14 October 2024:
|
What
I've learned from all those writing is that writing for me is an act of
reverence. I treat words that come out of me as valuable gems or
seeds—miracles waiting to happen. This is an even deeper poetics than a
walking poetics. To see my words and my writing as something that could
build up a person in any way.
The challenge and calling then in terms of writing is how
to keep it this way. How can I ensure that how I approach writing as a
practice maintains this reverential treatment of it and how can I give
birth to words that are truly a balm for others?
In addition, how can I build a writing life inspired by a
spiritual quest, practice it happily every day, and at its own best
time produce nurturing work for those who listen to me?
|
|
7.1
Andrew James Brown:
|
[T]he
civilised worm is always-already breaking up the soil of a compacted
self in a way that doesn’t destroy its integrity as a self, but,
instead, is opening it up to allow the inflowing of many new insights
and ideas which begins to turn us into what Imaoka-sensei eventually
came to call “cosmic human beings” (宇宙人 uchūjin), i.e. human beings who are fully aware of the inter- and intra-connectedness of all things.
|
7.2
Journal, 15 October 2024:
|
This
ikigai and the self behind it is already here. I may not have
articulated it well enough but it is already here. What I initially
think is my diversion from it to other subjects is the worm breaking it
down. I am letting other people in, exploring other communities and
perspectives to break the self up.
|
|
8.1
Herbert Fingarette:
|
These
studies are outcomes rather than realised objectives. In making the
journey, I have no aims. These studies are intellectual footprints, not
blueprints.
|
Andy Matuschak:
|
An
exhortation. When I find myself lost in tiny details, focused on
execution over wondering and big-picture questions, I try to remind
myself to get curious. My default mode, having spent so many years as a technologist, is to focus on tasks, on doing, on accomplishing.
That’s often necessary to meaningful intellectual creative work, but
it’s certainly not sufficient. Too much doing-focus will crowd out the
expansive mindset which generates new insights. It’s hard to hear
yourself think.
|
8.2
My jiyū shūkyō:
|
Since
creating my jiyū shūkyō will be a long and winding process, it's unwise
to treat it like a project. It's best maintained or supervised as a
life area. Success in this endeavor isn't measured by finishing or
reaching an end point but by maintaining a certain standard. In this
case, my standard for my jiyū shūkyō could be something like a portion
of my mission statement: "I'm engaged every day in a pursuit of wisdom,
meaning, and beauty."
Specifically, success in my jiyū shūkyō area includes the following:
- maintenance of contemplative practices like seiza and walking
- maintenance of mindful reading, journaling, and studying through my talahardin
- maintenance of practices through communities and others
- maintenance of creative practices involving walking, writing, and photography
But
how do I study in a way that makes me feel that I'm not constricted,
that I'm allowed to flow and follow my curiosities, while maintaining a
measure of focus?
In the creation of my jiyū shūkyō, I need to let go of
this desire for blueprints. Spirituality and answers to how to live are
best left unblueprinted. I should have faith that this process will
result to something. As long as I follow my curiosities and
authenticity, I will eventually focus.
|
|
9.1
Isabelo de los Reyes, Anitismo:
|
The
ancient chronicles of Jesuit and Hispanic friars say that upon the
arrival of the first Spaniards, the coasts of the Visayas and even in
Manila, there were many converts to Mohammedanism, and even more could
be found in Mindanao that were converted by the islamic teachers from
Borneo. So, if we are to find the true Philippine religion at its
purest, we must look to the mountainous regions of the North. Knowing
how to distinguish the True Religion from those that were influenced by
the Hindu, Mohammedan and Christian grafts can be difficult, but the
true Philippine religion is still intact, not only among the Itnegs
(Tinguians), but in the legends, advices and superstitions of the
Tagalog's, Visayan's, Bicolano's, Kapampangan's, Zambaleno's,
Pangasinero's and other Filipino ethnic groups.
|
9.2
Journal, 18 October 2024:
|
Precolonial
Filipino spirituality had Hindu and Buddhist influence. There is some
proof that our culture was closely influenced by South Asian culture.
Ancient Filipino religion must have been syncretic—a mix of anitism,
Hinduism, Buddhism, and some Islam, particularly in the south. One could
only imagine what our society looked like without the coming of
Christianity. Maybe we are a country of contemplatives, growing up from
homes where we both meditated but also believe in Bathala or Laon or
Kabunian—perhaps something like Tibetan Buddhism. A mix of animitism and
Buddhism would produce something like this. And since none of these
ancient religions are colonial, they wouldn't destroy each other. All
would've flourished and will have more resources today for creating
religions of the future or individual spiritualities.
|
|
10.1
Raymond Guess:
|
So
the experience I have of my everyday work environment is of a
conformist, claustrophobic and repressive verbal universe, a penitential
domain of reason-mongering in which hyperactivity in detail—the
endlessly repeated shouts of "why," the rebuttals, calls for "evidence,"
qualifications and quibbles—stands in stark contrast to the immobility
and self-referentiality of the structure as a whole. I suffer from
recurrent bouts of nausea in the face of this densely woven tissue of
"arguments," most of which are nothing but blinds for something else
altogether, generally something unsavory; and I feel an urgent need to
exit from it altogether.
|
10.2
Journal, 31 October 2024:
|
In
creative writing, the need to produce something that is understandable
is akin to an obsession with ratiocination observable in analytic
philosophy. A perfectly linear and understandable piece of writing has
some semblance to a bulletproof philosophical argumentation. While there
is some comfort from reading both pieces, the desire to make sense
could be nauseating, especially when most works produced are saturated
by this slavery to function and reason.
|
|
| | |
Comments