The Flight of the Phoenix: Finding Our Free-Religious Bearings in an Era of Crises
A short “thought for the day” offered to the Cambridge Unitarian Church as part of the Sunday Gathering of Mindful Meditation, Music & Conversation
(A recorded version of the piece can be heard at this link)
—o0o—
—o0o—
A 1965 film utterly captivated me as a teenager, and I want to tell you its story. The Flight of the Phoenix, based on Elleston Trevor’s novel, follows Frank Towns (James Stewart), captain of a twin-engined cargo plane flying a dozen oil-industry workers across the Sahara towards Benghazi. Disastrously, a sudden sandstorm shuts down the engines, forcing them to crash-land deep in the desert.
The survivors confront a grim reality: despite a large cargo of dates, they have only enough water for a couple of weeks. Despair swiftly sets in, and when a desperate attempt by three men to walk to an oasis ends in tragedy, hope seems entirely lost.
Then an aeronautical engineer among them, Dorfmann (Hardy Krüger), proposes a seemingly crazy idea: dismantle the wreckage and build a smaller aircraft to fly themselves to safety. It is a desperate plan, yet it gives the survivors a powerful focus, channelling their remaining energy and limited resources into something both creative and positive.
Tension peaks when Towns discovers that Dorfmann actually designs model aeroplanes. Horrified that they are risking their lives on a machine designed by a man who works with ‘toys’, Towns nonetheless carries on with the plan, lacking any alternative. Having finished their makeshift, single-engined creation, they christen it The Phoenix, after the mythological bird rising from the ashes of its predecessor.
With the work finished, the crew tie themselves to the wings and start the engine. Of their seven starter cartridges, the first four fail. At last the engine catches, and—sliding down a steep sand dune to gather speed—the Phoenix takes flight. Astonishingly, they reach a nearby oasis, finding themselves almost overwhelmed by the ecstasy of survival and the joy of reconciliation.
Now, why do I tell you this story? Well, because I think it serves as a perfect parable for where the British Unitarian movement—and indeed our local free-religious community—finds itself today.
When I first wrote a version of this thought for the day in October 2020, amidst the unfolding pandemic, I noted that it would inevitably exacerbate the challenges we already faced: falling membership, shifting understandings of spirituality and religion, changing local demographics, and ageing infrastructure. Consequently, everything we had been doing as a liberal, free-religious movement for the previous century was going to be seriously affected.
Now, six years on, our collective situation has grown even more precarious. To the pandemic’s lasting fallout we must now add disorientating concerns over artificial intelligence, the escalating climate emergency, the rapidly approaching El Niño, the devastating wars in Ukraine and Iran, and the weakening of liberal democracy—all of which will massively affect the cost of fuel, food, and transport. For Unitarian and Free Christian communities up and down the country, what once worked is either no longer working or soon won’t be. Remember, our national movement currently comprises only around 160 active chapels (about 170 congregations in total when including smaller fellowships and online communities) and 2,426 formal voting members, within a wider informal community of, perhaps, roughly 3,000 to 4,000 regular participants.
And it’s not just us. Indeed, on the morning I gave this address on Radio 4’s Sunday programme, I heard that the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Glasgow plans to halve its 80 parishes to around 40 over the next five to ten years, closing 24 church buildings—a 30 per cent drop.
Of course, I realise this sounds pretty miserable, but, as most of you know, I very much agree with something said by the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century British Idealist philosopher, F. H. Bradley, in his the Preface to his Appearance and Reality: ‘Where everything is bad it must be good to know the worst’, and ‘Where all is rotten it is a man’s work to cry stinking fish.’
We have to be realistic in our assessment of the situation because only that will help us find genuinely creative and positive ways forward. That is why I began with The Flight of the Phoenix.
So, let’s now imagine the modern British Unitarian movement as a kind of aircraft—one we must candidly admit has crashed in recent years, scattering its surviving occupants and components across a remarkably inhospitable cultural and social landscape. In this situation, there are, I think, three vital lessons we can learn from the story.
The first lesson is that we can only use what is at hand. The Phoenix could only be made from materials actually scattered across the desert floor; nothing absent could be drawn upon, however much the crew desired this or that ideal part. For us, this means carefully surveying the scattered fragments of our movement’s once-vigorous form of life to see what remains genuinely serviceable. In my view, the shattering of our old aircraft has actually exposed hidden resources and undischarged energies we had largely forgotten about. Even so, we cannot rely on an ideal wish-list; we must build with what we hold in our hands today.
The second lesson is to prioritise only the essential payload. In the desert, that new aircraft, the Phoenix, could carry only the most precious cargo: the crew themselves, along with their motivating stories, faith, hopes, and values. So, for us, for our movement, beyond ourselves, that payload is our liberal, free-thinking tradition’s best motive powers. Now, of course, I’ve been consistently arguing for a number of years , that these centre upon the light, portable, practical guides inherited from the Japanese minister Imaoka Shin’ichirō’s Principles of Living and the Czech Unitarian minister Norbert Fabián Čapek’s Ten Advices. At their heart, these draw upon the still-practical wisdom of the human Jesus, as well as Śākyamuni Buddha, the critical, ethical reasoning of Socrates and Confucius, and, of course, the teachings of many other great religious figures from other religious traditions. The Principles and Advices allow us to carry these inspiring figures aboard our Phoenix without the heavy doctrinal and dogmatic weight of the religions once founded in their name.
And the third lesson is to embrace a temporary pragmatism. Crucially, the Phoenix is not designed to be a shiny, futuristic, world-beating craft. It is an ad-hoc creation built for a short emergency flight to a temporary oasis where the crew can recover, regroup, and rethink—only then turning their thoughts to some grander project. In the present moment, our Phoenix likewise need only be a provisional craft. We are not tasked right now with building the final, post-crisis future of the British Unitarian movement, and recognising this should lift the weight of thinking we must immediately solve every difficulty the future may bring.
That is a job for when, and if, we make it to the oasis. Our job today is entirely pragmatic: assemble the pieces available to us, get the Phoenix into the air with ourselves, Imaoka-sensei’s Principles, and Čapek’s Advices on board, and set a powerful and sustainable ethical course of travel.
As to what may follow, only time and luck will tell. Yet as those survivors in the desert discovered, the very act of building the Phoenix together transformed their despair into shared purpose and creative hope. And I remain convinced that what happened to them can happen to us.
So friends, we have a free-religious Phoenix to build, and a flight to make.

Comments
I also do not like this sort of story, because not everyone gets out, and I am the sort of character that is the scapegoat or victim in this type of story. I am Piggy in Lord of the Flies.
We also already have a metaphor for this sort of activity: "We sew here then there, hold up tattered fabric to the light" I could not quarrel with describing the fabric of Unitarianism as tattered. Where does it most need us, what threads do we hold, and where can we place them?
We cannot help living and we cannot help dying. It is the nature of the world. Down at the smallest scales fragments of possibilities flit in and out of existence faster than an eye can blink. There was a time before we were alive and there will be a time after we are dead. Empires rise and fall. Congregations also have a life cycle. There was a time before Unitarianism, and there will be a time after Unitarianism. He who would save his life must lose it. Be like the Phoenix, Lay an egg before you crash and burn!
Indeed, it is a fantasy story, but less so than one might suppose. This is because the Phoenix in the film (the Tallmantz Phoenix P-1) was made up of bits of other aircraft, yet was able to fly. Alas, however, there was a catastrophic crash whilst filming 'safety shots' in case the earlier footage was not enough. The pilot, Paul Mantz, died, whilst his stunt man passenger, Bobby Rose, survived.
I take very seriously your point about the experience of being "Piggy" in Lord of the Flies, but in this film, there is no scapegoat as in Lord of the Flies, and reconciliation and even joy in surviving together is experienced by those who survive. There are moments of tension in the film that can make it feel like such a figure is going to emerge, but one of the interesting aspects of the film is that this doesn't happen.
As to your point that not everyone gets out, that is true. But what is also true is that not everyone survives a church's transition from being one kind of community to becoming another kind. This is true, even when the transition is managed well. I value the Flight of the Phoenix because it doesn't shy away from that difficult truth . . . a truth that, as a minister, I'd often love to be able to shy away from . . .
Thanks again for writing, and particularly for your well-made comments in your final two paragraphs.